Decolonising Environmental Law through Legal Pluralism: Indigenous Tribal Knowledge Practices and the Quest for Environmental Justice in India

Authors

  • Amit Kumar Singh CSLG, JNU Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62656/

Keywords:

Environment, Indigenous Tribal Knowledge Practices, ITKP, Legal Pluralism

Abstract

The tribal community in India and worldwide is recognised and visualised in their unique social and cultural distinctiveness and conducive cultural practices in tune with environmental protection, fulfilling the basic needs of tribal peoples from nature. This aspect is entirely and sharply distinct from the cultural supremacist and economic ideologies that terms social-cultural practices and lifestyle of tribal people as dirty, rustic, undeveloped, illiterate, uneducated, lawbreakers, and by birth criminals, and is attuned with supremacy and hegemony of a development and cultural ideology which promotes its economic interests through formal and unitary law, modernization and urbanization inspired narrative, and discouraging and subjecting the parallel indigenous customary cultural practices as antagonistic and anti-development. The universalist and unitary logic constantly threatens the diverse and distinct customs and practices that differ from the dominant ideology and worldview.

The Academic writing and reports from all corners of the world show the real motive of development narratives and its subsequent effects on environmental degradation, unsustainable exploitation of ecological resources, deprivation and displacement of indigenous tribal communities from their homeland, poverty, and unemployment, which are seriously affecting the life possibilities of tribal community enshrined and protected under Article 21 of the Constitution of India (OXFAM Report 2024).  

This paper will use legal pluralism as a doctrinal research method and framework to examine the prospect of Tribal Indigenous Knowledge Practices (ITKP), in distinction to global and dominant narrative, and environmental practices, as an alternative, complementary, and viable model of law and legal practices for adequate protection of the environment and ecological resources for all.

Author Biography

  • Amit Kumar Singh, CSLG, JNU

    I, Amit Kumar Singh, am a PhD Scholar at the Centre for the Study of Law and Governance, JNU. I graduated in Law and am interested in the intersection of law and other humanities subjects. 

References

Althusser, L. Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays (B. Brewster, Trans., pp. 127–186). Monthly Review Press. (Original work published in 1970).

Ambedkar, B.R. 1955. Riddles in Hinduism. https://dn720006.ca.archive.org/0/items/riddles-in-hinduism/Riddles%20in%20Hinduism.pdf

Chen, Y. (2022). ‘How Has Ecological Imperialism Persisted? A Marxian Critique of the Western Climate Consensus.’ The American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 81. 473–501. 10.1111/ajes. 12475, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363389680_How_Has_Ecological_Imperialism_Persisted_A_Marxian_Critique_of_the_Western_Climate_Consensus.

Davies, Margaret, ' Legal Pluralism,' in Peter Cane, and Herbert M. Kritzer (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (2010; online edn, Oxford Academic, 18 Sept. 2012), https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542475.013.0034.

Dutta, R. C. 1969. The Economic History of India. New York: A.M. Kelley.

Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, Volume 1: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). Pantheon Books.

Galanter, M. (2018). Law and Society in Modern India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Galeano, E. (1997). Open veins of Latin America: Five centuries of the pillage of a continent (C. Belfrage, Trans.). Monthly Review Press. (Original work published 1971).

Keynes, J. M. (2017). The general theory of employment, interest, and money. Wordsworth Editions.

Klein, N. (2008). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism (1st Picador ed.). New York: Picador.

Locke, J. (2017). Two Treatises of Government. New Delhi: Peacock Books.

Marx, K. (1990). Capital: A critique of political economy (Vol. 1, B. Fowkes, Trans.). Penguin Books. (Original work published 1867).

Mbembe, A. 2019. Necropolitics (S. Corcoran, Trans.). Duke University Press.

Menski, W. 2003. Hindu law: Beyond tradition and modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Merry, S. E. (1988). ‘Legal pluralism.’ Law & Society Review, 22(5), 869–896. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638.

Mody, A. (2023). India is broken: A people betrayed, independence to today. Stanford University Press.

Naroji, Dadabhai. 1901. Poverty and Un-British Rule in India. London: London S. Sonnenschein.

OXFAM Report (2024). Inequality Inc. https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/inequality-inc. (Accessed 10 December 2024).

Piketty, Thomas. (2022). A Brief History of Equality. London: Harvard University Press.

Pistor, K. (2019). The code of capital: How the law creates wealth and inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Reddy, G., & Mishra, A. (2019). Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Sustainable Development in India. India: Sage Publications.

Sandel, M. J. (2009). Justice: What is The Right Thing to Do? New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

Sen, A. (2009). The Idea of Justice. New Delhi: Penguin Books.

Supreme Court of India. 2013. Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd. v. Ministry of Environment and Forest & Others, (2013) 6 SCC 476.

Swenson, G. 2018. Legal Pluralism in Theory and Practice. International Studies Review, Volume 20, Issue 3, September 2018, Pages 438–462, https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/vix060.

Young, J. D. (1969). Marxism, Liberalism, and the process of industrialisation. Winter Spring. Prepared for the Marxist Internet Archive.

Published

31.12.2025

How to Cite

Singh, A. K. (2025). Decolonising Environmental Law through Legal Pluralism: Indigenous Tribal Knowledge Practices and the Quest for Environmental Justice in India. Journal of Native India & Diversity Studies, 2(3), 66-79. https://doi.org/10.62656/